The secret system behind George Carlin's comedy genius
I spent a few dozen hours reading books and listening to comedy shows about one of my creative heroes: George Carlin. His autobiography Last Words is particularly good. Carlinās cutting observations about daily life are still fascinating and prescient. Hereās what he said about creating:. āWords are all we have, really. We have thoughts but thoughts are fluid. Then we assign a word to a thought and weāre stuck with that word for that thought, so be careful with words. I like to think that the same words that hurt can heal. Itās a matter of how you pick them.ā Carlin didnāt separate life and creating. Everything he did ā watching TV, walking, driving ā was a chance to find something he found ridiculous or enraging. Every day, he worked on his ideas, refined them, and rewrote them. His material went through dozens of rewrites on legal pads, as typed-up manuscripts, and later as bits he performed and honed in front of a crowd. One example? His famous bit about Seven Dirty Words started out as a listicle that he turned into a routine, which heād get cancelled for today. (Go ahead and look that bit up⦠Iāll wait) Throughout his career, Carlin relied on a creative system. He created categories, cross-references, and thematic links that allowed him to pull together unrelated observations into cohesive routines. Thatās why his comedy sounds so spontaneous and well-crafted. After Carlin died in 2008, his daughter Kelly found not but THREE packed storage units that were packed full of notes, observations, and bits for his comedy routines. The National Comedy Centre acquired all of Carlinās notes after his death. His estate archivist believes Carlin learned early, āA good idea is not of any use if you canāt find it.ā Carlin is just one example of a creative who relied on a system for managing his notes, ideas, and research. These days, Iām still surprised that creators donāt bother with any of this. Perhaps because writing down what you think about something is more work than asking ChatGPT to explain it. These armchair creators claim that we have AI. And we sure do. ChatGPT and Claude can spit out thousands of words faster than anyone can type. But the results are often boring and clichĆ©d. I can spot clichĆ©d AI content a mile off. AI is helpful, but itās also responsible for a lot of boring slop nobody wants. A good idea with a distinct voiceāYOUR VOICEāis all the more valuable. Thatās how your work will stand out. You need a system to do it. Tomorrow, Iāll tell you more. |